Google

E-Cards, Rhymes or Nasty Grams!

To VIEW the Card: Click on the name.

Nice Day
Birthday
Occasion
Miss Ya
Equality
Drunk
$250
Britney
Do It

My Dog
Dating
Karma
Hit Man
Go!
Leave
Toast
Work
No Job
Children
Cooking

Recipient's First Name

Your First Name

"To" E-Mail Address

The Card Should Say:

Want to advertise on, invest in or otherwise contribute to  The Answer Man?

Write to The Man

Home Page
The Man's Advice Column
Guest Advice Columnists 
Answer Man Blog

The Cover Girl
This Is Cool: Online 
Advice Forums
Advice Column Archives   

The Mission
Who's The Man? 
Contact The Man
Guest Columnist Login


--- The Answer Man Blog --- 


The Prophet Muhammad vs. Free Speech
I'm not going to re-print caricatures of Muhammad. (I'd like to, just because it will annoy a lot of these rage-filled crazy people, but I won't simply because it would serve no other purpose.) We've all seen the images by now anyway.

I would like, however, to point out that you moderate Muslims need to figure out a way to get things under control over there. Religion in general holds far too much power in the United States, let alone in your countries where you can still be arrested and even executed by the state for blasphemy.

No wonder the whole sane and civilized world is trying desperately to keep WMD out of the hands of people like Iran. These are countries in a part of the world where rule by the law of man is abhorred, reason is absent among leaders, and only religious zealotry prevails in government. You can't give a big gun to these people. They would eventually, inevitably, shoot us with it.

So, for all the Muslims out there reading this blog: please - call your friends and family overseas and let them know that they need to tone things down and get themselves under control. Let me also state for the record that I hope we (i.e. our collective governments) stand up for our freedoms in this time of uncertainty. While I'm definitely NOT looking for confrontation and bloodshed with our Muslim friends, I also realize that Muslims must come to understand that free speech is alive and well in our countries which means, plainly, that it is unacceptable to kill anyone over publishing a cartoon. The fundamental right of freedom of speech has always been worth fighting for.

The fact that the Muhammad picture was drawn to illustrate to Muslims that some westerners consider them violent is ironically answered with violence rather then dialog. Instead of Muslims collectively responding to the image by saying something like, 'Who, us? We're not a violent people', Muslims have turned en mass to demonstrations, arson, and death threats. Who can blame that poor artist for drawing the picture to begin with? He was expressing something that many people have wanted to say for a long time. We're fed up with all the violence coming out of that region of the world. You need to learn to live peacefully once and for all.

Now, while I'm at it - let me just also say that American foreign policy sucks. Bush's 'my way or the highway' Texas-style leadership hasn't done much at all to win friends and influence people here or abroad. Also, invading Iraq may have been a mistake (not really sure about that yet). And of course Americans can be wasteful, controlling and generally ego centric as a civilization. I don't want to ignore those realities while sitting in my glass house criticizing Muslims. We both suck equally, but in different ways.

I'm usually able to predict things when it comes to fallout from national or international events, but I'm on the bleachers for the event - at least for now. A direct criticism of Muhammad versus the rights of Westerners to free speech from within their own borders seems to me about the most stark clash of cultures one could possibly imagine. Who knows what will happen next?

Created: Sunday, February 05, 2006


Comments

Posted by Miss N on Feb. 07, 2006

I'm glad you blogged on this topic. It is SO divisive. It really seems to be a one side or the other argument. Not a lot of shades of gray.

I don't buy the line that the papers should have known better and not printed the cartoon. Essentially that is like telling a woman who wears a short skirt that she was asking to be raped. Or telling your kids to just hand over their lunch money to the bully. I get the point that it was like picking at a sore.. But like you said, freedom of speech, freedom of the press.. these are rights worth defending.

I wonder if we can extend this any further.. it has been mentioned that we incarcerate (at least in Canada) holocaust deniers. Now, I'm clearly NOT a supporter of Naziism and I do believe that any professor or teacher who tries to revise history should be fired (I mean duh.. we'd fire a math teacher if he taught that it was impossible to calculate the diameter of a circle and that calculus was a Protestant plot) but freedom of speech MUST extend all the way - or we have no right to tromp all over the globe defending it.

And there's another point. We AREN'T tromping all over the globe defending it.. or at least we haven't quite gotten that far yet.. so WHY should these people burn things down when it isn't even their own laws and customs in their own backyards that are being offended?

I hate that this is making me want a world war. I am essentially a pacifist. (But subscribe to the theory that diplomacy has got to be buttressed by a kick-ass army)

If you're interested, there's an interesting article on Alternet.org comparing this to the pre-civil war conditions in the US. Food for thought, anyway.



Post a Comment

Name:
Email Address:
Comments:
 

 Bookmark The Answer Man Web site